Skip to main content

Parks & Braxton, PA: Miami DUI Lawyer | Criminal Defense

Serving Miami-Dade and the Florida Keys

Call 24/7 Nights, Weekends & Holidays

645-400-6504

Results

Sep 17, 2026 Case: 26-CT-005393 Judge C. Brown
Facts: Officers responded to a call for service as the defendant's vehicle was disabled and blocking a road near the highway. Officers found the defendant passed out in the driver's seat. They observed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and an unsteady gait. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, finger to nose, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .135 and .127 in the breath machine.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the breath test results. While requesting a breath test, the officer misled the defendant into believing that if he blew, he would get a hardship permit, but if he refused, he would not. That was a misstatement of law. Just prior the motion hearing date, the State knew they would lose the breath test based on all the case law and Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 16, 2026 Case: 26-CT-004698 Judge Griner
Facts: The defendant was stopped for swerving within his lane. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, watery/glassy eyes, and he admitted to consuming alcohol. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .113 and .113 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 16, 2026 Case: 26-CT-007966 Judge Griner
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving, traveling on the wrong side of the road, and fluctuating speeds. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glossy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test. This was his Second DUI.
Defense: The officer told the defendant on tape that when he got his driver's license, he had agreed to perform field sobriety tests. This is not true and misinformation. On a driver's license where it says that you consent to any sobriety tests required by law, it refers to a breath, blood, or urine test, not field sobriety tests. After negotiations and realizing all the roadside tests would be excluded from evidence, the State Dropped his Second DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 16, 2026 Case: AN9NJME Judge Dittmer
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving. He was crossing over the white lines and straddling the dotted lines. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a sway to his stance, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, estimation of 30 seconds, finger to nose, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 16, 2026 Case: AMR105E Judge Zuroweste
Facts: Officers got called out to a suspicious vehicle parked in a neighborhood. Officers walked up to the car and saw the defendant behind the wheel with the window down. They noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .139 and .135 in the breath machine.
Defense: In the back of the police car, a conversation ensued about whether to take the breath test. The officer told the defendant something to the effect of that if the breath machine showed .000's, he would take him back to his car. An officer cannot say that because one cannot be unarrested for DUI. That was coercion and misinformation. After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 15, 2026 Case: 26-CF-014543 Judge Branning
Facts: Officers arrived on scene after an EMS truck almost hit the defendant as her car had gotten a flat and was partially sticking out in the roadway. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and an inability to keep her balance. After performing the HGN (eye test), one leg stand, finger to nose, and alphabet tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test. This was her Third DUI within ten years and she was charged with Felony DUI.
Defense: On tape, she was not off-balance or unsteady, her speech was normal, and she was responsive and coherent. She told the officer that she could not do the walk and turn due to severe scoliosis and a balance issue due to being deaf in one ear. Yet the officer skipped over that exercise and had her do a one leg stand. It made no sense at all. She then stated the alphabet correctly and did fine on the finger to nose. We provided a stack of medical records to the State showing that she was telling the truth about her scoliosis and balance issues. It was also clear the arresting officer was being trained and this was a training exercise. A few days before the trial call, the State Dismissed her Felony DUI.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Sep 14, 2026 Case: 26-CT-502241 Judge Gonzalez
Facts: The defendant was stopped for driving too slowly. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, beer and rum in the car, and he was argumentative. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: Parks & Braxton filed a pretrial motion to suppress the lawfulness of the traffic stop. In our motion, we alleged that traffic has to be impeded by the defendant's slow driving pursuant to Florida Statutes and case law. Here, no traffic was affected or impeded at all. The State agreed prior the motion date and Dismissed the DUI.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Sep 14, 2026 Case: 26-MM-000856 Judge Poblick
Facts: Police were called to the gas station parking lot as the defendant allegedly backed into another car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, she appeared unstable, had bloodshot eyes, and struggled to keep her balance. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, finger to nose, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: On tape there were three officers. Two said they could not smell any alcohol versus the first one. Also, they initially thought there was a crash but there was none. Furthermore, this was clearly a training exercise as one cop jumped in to help the other one in administering the roadside tests. After negotiations, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 14, 2026 Case: 26-CT-001139 Judge Poblick
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and almost crashing into a guardrail. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glossy/bloodshot eyes, and unsteadiness. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .098 and .094 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 9, 2026 Case: 26-CT-006009 Judge Valkenburg
Facts: The defendant was stopped for running over a curb while making a turn and stopping in the crosswalk of an intersection. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a sway to her stance, slurred speech, mood swings, and bloodshot eyes. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. She was arrested for DUI and later blew a .143 and .136 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CM-001382 Judge C. Brown
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CT-004180 Judge Taylor
Facts: The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, red/glossy eyes, and the defendant admitted to having consumed beer. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI.
Defense: In one report, the officer wrote that the defendant had refused to perform the roadside tests and in another report, he wrote the defendant performed poorly on the field sobriety tests. It was obvious that he was just cut and pasting sentences in his reports. His credibility was called into question. The DUI was Dismissed after we brought this to the attention for the prosecutor.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CT-020450 Judge C. Brown
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving and following too closely. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, he seemed confused, fumbled with his documents, and had bloodshot eyes. He refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: The firm announced ready for trial. After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CT-005019 Judge Smith
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand exercises. He was arrested for DUI and later blew a .190 and .189 in the breath machine.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CT-022551 Judge Garagozlo
Facts: The defendant was stopped for almost striking another car, swerving off the roadway and almost striking a sign. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, unsteadiness, glassy eyes, and she admitted to having consumed wine. While attempting to administer the walk and turn, the defendant became argumentative and was placed under arrest for DUI. She later blew a .147 and .134.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CT-001415 Judge C. Brown
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving and speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and watery eyes, The defendant refused to perform any roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was his Second DUI.
Defense: On tape, one officer can be heard asking the defendant if he identifies as Hispanic. The defendant responded to the officer that why didn't he ask if he identifies as a black woman (sarcastically). This was a very concerning remark. In discussions with the State, we brought this up to the State that he may have been arrested solely because of his ethnicity. The State Dropped his Second DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 8, 2026 Case: 26-CT-005075 Judge C. Brown
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, a red face, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and he appeared unsteady. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense: On tape, his speech was normal and not slurred and he was not off balance or unsteady. The firm announced ready for trial. Prior to trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 3, 2026 Case: 26-CT-006903 Judge C. Brown
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding and running a red light. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, she appeared unsteady, fumbled with her documents, exhibited a blank stare, and had thick tongued speech. She only performed the HGN (eye test) and refused to perform any other field sobriety tests. She was arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense: After negotiations with the State regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.
Sep 3, 2026 Case: 25-CF-003379 Judge Flowers
Facts: The defendant was stopped for weaving. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and slurred/thick tongued speech. He also appeared unsteady on his feet. The defendant only performed the HGN (eye test) and then refused to perform any more field sobriety tests. He later refused a breath test. This was his third DUI within ten years and he was charged with a Felony DUI. He was also charged with Felony Driving on a Suspended License as a Habitual Traffic Offender.
Defense: The firm took a pretrial deposition of the officer who stopped the defendant. At the deposition, we were able to establish that the defendant only weaved two times over a very short distance. After conversations with the State and providing them case law, the Felony DUI and Felony DWLS were Dismissed.
Result: The DUI was dismissed.
Sep 3, 2026 Case: AMGFTNE Judge Szematowicz
Facts: The defendant was stopped for speeding. Officers detected an odor of marijuana, bloodshot/watery eyes, and a sway to his stance. The defendant refused to perform any field sobriety tests, other than HGN (eye test), and he was subsequently arrested for DUI. He later provided a urine sample which came back from the lab positive for marijuana. This was his Second DUI arrest.
Defense: We pointed out to the State that upon review of the video tape, there was not one normal faculty impaired. There was no erratic driving pattern, his speech was normal, he had no sway on tape, walked normal, and looked and sounded fine. The State Dropped his Second DUI arrest and he received no probation at all. It should be noted that the firm represented this defendant on his last DUI and got that one Dropped as well.
Result: The State dropped the DUI.

Obtain Immediate Legal Help

To save your license, you must take action within 10 days. Contact a partner about your case today by calling (645) 400-6504 or fill out the form here.

Contact Us Today

By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Parks & Braxton, PA at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance.