Parks & Braxton, PA
5.0
Over 30 5-Star Reviews
Dealing with the consequences of a DUI charge, especially when facing multiple offenses, can significantly impact your life and future. During this challenging period, the defense and guidance of a multiple DUI attorney can make a huge impact on how your case plays out. At Parks & Braxton, PA, we understand the gravity of your situation. We are committed to providing the fierce legal advocacy you need to get through the legal proceedings ahead.
When you work with our firm, we will navigate the DUI law complexities, build a strong defense, and ensure your rights are protected throughout the process. We’ll take a comprehensive approach, focusing on your unique circumstances to tailor our defense strategy accordingly. While you may be feeling overwhelmed, you do not have to face the criminal justice system and proceedings alone. Our firm is here to fight for you.
Don’t wait to begin your defense. Call (305) 928-1791 to schedule a consultation with a multiple DUI lawyer.
-
DUI00028978MM10AFacts The defendant was involved in an accident. The officer saw him staggering and walking slowly. The officer noticed ...
-
DUI
The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.
0021-XBUFacts The defendant was initially seen by anonymous concerned citizens driving all over the road. Police dispatch was ... -
DUIThe Jury found the defendant Not Guilty. 0021-XBU (JURY TRIAL)Facts The defendant was initially seen by anonymous concerned citizens driving all over the road. Police dispatch was ...
-
DUI0053-XDKFacts The defendant was stopped for driving slowly and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and ...
-
DUI0067-XDKFacts The defendant was stopped for numerous improper lane changes and speeding. The officer observed an odor of ...
-
DUI0085-XERFacts The defendant was the at fault driver as he hit a parked car. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, rapid speech, ...
Facts
The defendant was involved in an accident. The officer saw him staggering and walking slowly. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol and asked the defendant to perform sobriety tests. The defendant refused saying that he had a couple of drinks and would fail the tests. The officer also stated that his speech was slurred.Result
Motion granted. State appealed in front of Judge Horowitz and lost. All evidence was thrown out. The state will be dismissing the charges on September 25, 2003.The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.
0021-XBUFacts
The defendant was initially seen by anonymous concerned citizens driving all over the road. Police dispatch was informed that the defendant had pulled over to the side of the shoulder on the highway. Fire rescue was called to the scene. Sometime later, a State Trooper arrived and found the defendant sitting in the driver's seat of the car awake. The keys to the car were on the dashboard at this point. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbled/slurred speech, poor balance, and bloodshot eyes. He refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he admitted to drinking six vodka drinks, coming from a bar, and was on his way home. Also, he took a breath test which resulted in two samples of a .211 and .216. This was the defendant's Second DUI and third DUI arrest.
Defense
At jury trial, Parks & Braxton pointed out to the jury that the State presented a lack of evidence by not bringing in any fire rescue workers who initially found the defendant and saw his condition. Also they did not bring in any fire rescue reports, whether the defendant was initially sleeping, and no evidence of how the keys even got on the dashboard. Our other argument to the jury was that the defendant was not in actual physical control of the vehicle because when the officer approached the car the defendant had no "capability" of operating a car without keys in his hands nor in the ignition.
Result
The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.
Facts
The defendant was initially seen by anonymous concerned citizens driving all over the road. Police dispatch was informed that the defendant had pulled over to the side of the shoulder on the highway. Fire rescue was called to the scene. Sometime later, a State Trooper arrived and found the defendant sitting in the driver's seat of the car awake. The keys to the car were on the dashboard at this point. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, mumbled/slurred speech, poor balance, and bloodshot eyes. He refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he admitted to drinking six vodka drinks, coming from a bar, and was on his way home. Also, he took a breath test which resulted in two samples of a .211 and .216. This was the defendant's Second DUI and third DUI arrest.Result
The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.Facts
The defendant was stopped for driving slowly and weaving. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slow/slurred speech. The defendant performed the field sobriety tests at the request of the officer. For example, on the finger to nose, she did not touch the tip of her nose one time. On the estimation of time test, she only estimated 22 seconds for 30 seconds, used her arms for balance, and swayed. After her arrest for DUI, she refused the breath test.Result
Pursuant to the Statute of Limitations, the DUI was Dismissed.Facts
The defendant was stopped for numerous improper lane changes and speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and he was unsteady on his feet. The defendant could not perform any of the roadside tasks according to the officer's reports. He was arrested for DUI and refused the breath test.Result
The State read the sworn deposition on the morning of trial and then Dismissed the DUI.Facts
The defendant was the at fault driver as he hit a parked car. Officers observed an odor of alcohol, rapid speech, and bloodshot/watery eyes. The defendant admitted to being involved in the crash and coming from a party. The defendant was asked to conduct roadside tests but refused stating "it is your word against mine." He was then arrested for DUI Causing Property Damage and then he refused the breath test.Result
On the morning of trial, the State Dropped the DUI.
At Parks & Braxton, PA, we deliver comprehensive legal services tailored to meet your unique needs. Our team is dedicated to ensuring you are well-informed and actively involved in your legal journey. We pride ourselves on transparency, responsiveness, and a client-focused approach that fosters trust and clarity.
Why Choose Us:
- Client-centered with a focus on collaboration and communication
- Personalized attention with strategic, tailored legal solutions
- Commitment to transparency and active client participation
- Expert team skilled in navigating complex legal landscapes
- Responsive support and guidance in every step of the process
-
Proven Success Record
Thousands of successful cases in DUI and criminal defense.
-
Tailored Defense Strategies
Custom solutions for your unique legal challenges.
-
24/7 Legal Support
We're available anytime, day or night, to assist you.
-
Decades of Defense Expertise
Over 60 years of combined legal experience in criminal law.
At Parks & Braxton, PA, we deliver comprehensive legal services with a focus on client-centered solutions. Our team excels in navigating complex legal terrains, ensuring clarity and guidance at every turn. We prioritize collaboration and communication, keeping clients informed and engaged throughout the process. Our commitment to personalized service and transparency ensures that each client receives strategic, tailored solutions. Trust in our dedicated professionals to provide effective representation and counsel, setting us apart in the legal field. Embrace the peace of mind that comes with a trusted partner by your side, navigating your legal challenges with expertise and care.
-
Is jail mandatory for a multiple DUI offense?While jail time is often a component of penalties for multiple DUI offenses, whether it is mandatory depends on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the case. Some jurisdictions have minimum sentencing laws for repeat offenders, making jail time unavoidable unless negotiated differently in plea bargains.
-
Can I reduce penalties for multiple DUIs?Reducing penalties for multiple DUIs may be possible depending on your case specifics and legal representation. Attending alcohol education and treatment programs voluntarily, demonstrating genuine commitment to change, and cooperating fully with legal processes can all be positive factors.
-
What is an ignition interlock device?An ignition interlock device is a breathalyzer connected to a vehicle's ignition system. Drivers must provide a breath sample before starting the car. If alcohol is detected, the vehicle will not start. Installation is often mandated for drivers with multiple DUI offenses to prevent recidivism.
-
How long does a multiple DUI stay on my record?The duration that a multiple DUI remains on your record varies by state. In many areas, a DUI can remain on your driving record for ten years or more and may also appear on your criminal record permanently. Legal resources or an attorney can provide specifics for your jurisdiction.
- Palm Bay
- Brevard
- Melbourne
- West Melbourne
- Satellite Beach
- Indian Harbour Beach
- Melbourne Beach
- Rockledge